So, after the long introduction, here are the current
cricket world ratings, according to my Elo-based system:
Australia 142
India 116
Pakistan 93
South Africa 76
England 71
New Zealand 67
Sri Lanka -4
West Indies -75
Bangladesh -172
Zimbabwe -315
So there’s a familiar theme already: Australia are the best
team in the world. But the next thing to
note is that 6th placed New Zealand are within 100 points of
Australia; as we saw in the last post, in 2007, not a single team was rated
within 200 points of Australia. Where we
have big margins is at the bottom: Bangladesh are weak, and Zimbabwe even more
so.
An interesting thing is the story of South Africa’s
decline. South Africa begun 2015 in
first place and a rating of 188, and as recently as mid-November last year,
South Africa were leading the rankings:
South Africa 132
Australia 130
Pakistan 93
India 78
England 54
New Zealand 48
Sri Lanka 27
West Indies -74
Bangladesh -172
Zimbabwe -315
But poor results against India and England have seen them
fall back.
One other thing we might want to do is compare our ratings
to the official ICC ratings, which we can find here, and which are summarised below:
India 110
Australia 109
South Africa 109
Pakistan 102
England 102
New Zealand 99
Sri Lanka 89
West Indies 76
Bangladesh 47
Zimbabwe 5
The numerical values from the two systems are not strictly
comparable, but there’s a similar story
overall. The ICC ratings have an
absolute floor of zero, which Zimbabwe barely exceed; while the top teams all
have almost identical scores. The most striking difference is the ICC put India
on top, whereas our ratings favour Australia. The obvious question is which system
has produced the right result? In fact, there’s no real way of answering this
question, as if we knew which team was best as a fact, we wouldn’t need a rating
system to tell us. But we can try to understand where the differences come
from. To do this, we’re going to have to look at the ICC system in more detail. First up, however, we're going to compare the output of the two systems over the longer term.
No comments:
Post a Comment