So, England, nearly top in the world ratings at the end of the summer, one draw away from having beaten every team in the world (at the series level) more recently than they'd lost to them, and now? You can see from below that in my world ratings, it doesn't look good. The official world ratings still flatter them for the moment, but a downward adjustment is coming soon. A first-ever match loss to Bangladesh has been followed by three straight defeats to India, with just a draw in between. Now India are a fine (and arguably improving) side, playing at home (although the conditions have been less spin-friendly than they might have been). A defeat, in itself, is no shame (although obviously not the mark of world beaters). I'd say just one thing: you don't need six bowlers in a test match. No matter if you have a stack of fine seamers on turning pitches; no matter if your spinners are potentially unreliable; no matter if you've been struggling to find good batsmen. It seems to me that England have made their own troubles worse by refusing to pick a conventionally balanced side. The strategy didn't make sense to me (and didn't avoid defeat) in the U.A.E at the end of 2015; and it doesn't make sense now. At least the promising performances of Hameed and Jennings hint at how England might fill the gaps in their batting order longer term. But in this tour, one problem has surely been that they haven't been trying to fill enough gaps.
Meanwhile, hats off to India, who've outbowled and outbatted their visitors, in very convincing fashion, and who've now won six of their last seven tests. It will now be interesting to see if this talented side can do what so many Indian teams of promise have failed to do in the past, and follow up success at home with similar success away.
India 174 +10
South Africa 102
Australia 82
Sri Lanka 57
New Zealand 41
Pakistan 41
England 34 -10
West Indies -58
Bangladesh -148
Zimbabwe -325