The idea of the World Test Championship is every two years to stage a one-off game between the two best teams in the world, on the basis of the results in the intervening period. The method used to identify those teams is, somewhat strangely, not the record used in the official test team rankings. However, the teams selected for this year's match were the world's official top two, and also the top two teams in my rankings. All these criteria put Australia a long way ahead of South Africa, but in fact the underdogs managed to come from behind to win the game. The effect on my ratings is as follows:
- Australia 266 -29
- South Africa 226 +29
- England 171
- India 167
- New Zealand 148
- Sri Lanka 49
- Pakistan 12
- West Indies -18
- Bangladesh -115
- Ireland -275
- Afghanistan -306
- Zimbabwe -324
And the official rating (which unlike mine, can change with time even for teams that play no matches), now look like this:
- Australia 123 -4
- South Africa 114 +2
- England 113 +8
- India 105 -4
- New Zealand 95 -2
- Sri Lanka 87 +1
- Pakistan 78 -4
- West Indies 73 -3
-
Bangladesh 62 +1
- Ireland 30
- Afghanistan 21 +2
- Zimbabwe 12
So in spite of the result, both systems still assert that Australia are the top team. In fact, both systems now present an identical pecking order, albeit with differing margins. Shortly, Bangladesh will visit Sri Lanka, and India will begin a tour of England.